Prosecutor Declines Charges in Shooting Death of Jericho Home Improvements Owner: Self-Defense Case Details Revealed

KANSAS CITY, Missouri – Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker has announced that no charges will be filed in the shooting death of John Bartrom, the founder of Jericho Home Improvements. The decision stems from the belief that the incident was an act of self-defense, as indicated by the evidence gathered in consultation with police detectives.

Bartrom, 46, tragically lost his life in an early January 2024 shooting at 63rd and Prospect Avenue. The circumstances surrounding his death have left his family grappling with unanswered questions and a sense of disappointment in the handling of the case. Nora Schwartz, Bartrom’s sister, expressed a desire for clarity and closure by requesting access to the evidence that led to the conclusion of self-defense.

The prosecutor’s office revealed that Bartrom was involved in a struggle with the individual who ultimately shot him, leading to the use of lethal force. Despite the lack of charges, the family remains puzzled by the events that unfolded and the portrayal of Bartrom, who they describe as a loving family man. They highlight the need for transparency and a comprehensive understanding of the incident, as the current narrative does not align with their perception of Bartrom’s character.

In response to the family’s concerns, it was disclosed that the shooter was an Uber driver on duty at the time of the shooting. The invocation of the Castle Doctrine, which allows for self-defense without the obligation to retreat, has contributed to the absence of charges in this case. The family’s disappointment underscores their belief that the justice system should prioritize a more comprehensive examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding Bartrom’s death.

Missouri’s self-defense law provides guidelines for the use of force in defense of oneself or others, including the use of deadly force under specific conditions. The family’s quest for answers and justice persists, as they strive to reconcile the discrepancies between the official account and their understanding of Bartrom’s character and actions leading up to the tragic event.

As the investigation unfolds and new details emerge, the family of John Bartrom continues to seek clarity and closure in the aftermath of his untimely passing. The complexities of the case underscore the need for a thorough examination of the events that transpired and a commitment to upholding justice and accountability in the face of tragedy.