Gavin Newsom’s Latest Avoidance Tactics for Debating Ron DeSantis

Gavin Newsom’s possible reluctance to debate with Ron DeSantis has become a subject of speculation, and recent developments suggest he might be looking for a way out. Initially, Newsom proposed a debate challenge and suggested that Sean Hannity could be the moderator of the event. DeSantis accepted the challenge during a recent appearance on Fox News.

The situation became heated when DeSantis shared his proposed regulations for the debate, causing Nathan Click, Newsom’s spokesperson, to express his discontent, claiming, “What a joke.” Click dismissed DeSantis’ counterproposal as a mere fa├žade to conceal the Florida governor’s insecurities and alleged incompetence. Among the points of contention raised by Click were DeSantis’ desire to swap opening statements with a hype video, his request to curtail the time he needs to be on stage, and the addition of “cheat notes” and a cheering section.

Newsom’s spokesperson’s fiery response included a playful jab at DeSantis’ association with former President Donald Trump, claiming that it’s no surprise Trump is “kicking his ass.” The remark seemed to divert attention from the core issue: Newsom’s apparent hesitation to face DeSantis in the proposed debate.

Analyzing DeSantis’ proposed debate rules, it becomes evident that many provisions align with Newsom’s initial suggestions. Both parties agreed on having Sean Hannity as the sole moderator, a 90-minute duration for the debate, equal speaking time for each participant, and the inclusion of two-minute closing statements. These points of agreement should reasonably lay the groundwork for a fair and balanced discussion between the two governors.

The significant disagreement that has arisen centered on DeSantis’ desire for a live audience during the debate. Newsom’s adamant refusal to allow a live audience raises eyebrows and fuels speculations about his motivations. The traditional debate format often includes an audience, providing an unscripted and authentic element to the proceedings. By eschewing this aspect, Newsom might be aiming to create a more controlled environment where real people cannot respond to his statements, thus shielding him from potentially challenging reactions.

This refusal to embrace a live audience raises questions about Newsom’s preparedness and willingness to face direct interactions with the public. It’s not uncommon for politicians to engage with live audiences during debates, town hall meetings, and other public forums. Newsom’s reluctance on this matter could be seen as an attempt to shield himself from potential criticism or discomfort, suggesting a lack of confidence in his ability to handle unscripted challenges.

With DeSantis’ willingness to accept Newsom’s debate challenge and his readiness to adhere to many of the proposed rules, it appears that the ball is now in Newsom’s court. However, his apparent delay in committing to a specific debate date raises eyebrows. Despite his frequent press appearances, Newsom’s selection of mid-November as a potential date for the debate seems curious and might be interpreted as a stalling tactic.

As the situation unfolds, it becomes increasingly apparent that Newsom may be pressured to defend California’s governance compared to DeSantis’ record in Florida. The rhetoric and slick-talking aside, the facts seem to favor DeSantis, and Newsom might be grappling with the challenge of presenting a compelling case for California’s performance.

As the debate date looms, the pressure on Newsom to defend California’s governance against DeSantis’ record in Florida is palpable, and it remains to be seen whether he will embrace the challenge or seek a way out.